Some Rescue! (05)
Last Updated (Thursday, 20 October 2011 20:37) Written by Administrator Thursday, 21 July 2011 00:00
I prefer an older perspective
Yay! The old crappy ones again. I've been rushing through the 1983 stuff this week - so now we're back to 1978 for a bit. Isn't Leia stunningly gorgeous in this one? Even a later alteration couldn't improve it. In fact it made her worse! Angry wrinkle lines scratched across the bridge of her nose. At this time I was still under the Warlord Comic influence - see the spent cartridges flying out of the guns? Han in panel 1 was probably Luke originally, but was then changed with a few strokes of a black marker! The red fire appears to be scrawled in my trusty thick permanent gore marker! All in all I love this page.
Film Notes: Why? Why!!
One of the stupidest CGI changes to the original film was the one below.
Yeah, that was really worth the effort...
Apparently the matte-painted corridor (which to me looked brilliant) wasn't up to scratch when they decided to re-release the film in 2004. So they re-did it. The author of this fascinating SW versions-comparison site writes that the perspective was corrected. I was actually about to go into a big rant about George pointlessly fecking about with the film but then tried superimposing both images above - myself. I actually can't see any difference in the perspective. What they did do was to lengthen the corridor. Oh, and remove some of the nice colour and make it darker.
Well done lads.
Paolo Uccello
Paolo Uccello, the Italian Renaissance painter who lived and worked in Florence was a perspective nerd. Giorgio Vasari in his book Lives of the Artists wrote that Uccello was obsessed by his interest in perspective and would stay up all night in his study trying to grasp the exact vanishing point. Vasari says that this drove his wife to distraction.
(1 panel of) Battle of San Romano - Paolo Uccello, c.1438-40
Battle of San Romano
Uccello's famous painting - now in panels separated by continents - uses perspective in the most self-conscious manner. If you look at the fallen lances and bodies on the ground you can see that they've been arranged in a very artificial grid form - all pointing, very obviously, to a common vanishing point. Do you think Paolo was sort of missing the point of visual storytelling in this image?
Do you think scores of CGI'd Jedi blurring into battle, lightsabers flailing (as secondary background action) sort of misses the point of visual story-telling too?
Thanks for reading! Care to comment?
Comments
Not in the slightest - I actually love this entire scene. I would be happy to elaborate for your edification in the near future.
Actually, I originally wrote: "Do you think Paolo missed the point of visual art?" and "Do you think the PT missed the point of Star Wars?"
"Just watching the background action": I must try it. I'll take a few migralieves first though
As for the PT's, and Special Editions, I suppose they have some redeeming qualities, I just can't think of any at the moment. I've only ever seen them once each, and only the first one in the theater, because I was so unimpressed that I couldn't be bothered to do more.
Sure - there are lots of isolated bits or scenes in the PT I like too - but as total films, I don't enjoy them much.
It'd be great to:
1.) Let a good ruthless editor at them
2.) Use CGI - or re-shoots to improve other aspects like all that awful pop-culture stuff like Dexter and his 50s diner, and the dreadful out-of-place podrace commentators.
I don't think it'd take many resources compared to 3D-ising them. They'd be re-released in cinema, DVD, BluRay, CyberBeam, Vinyl etc., **Ka-Chinnnng!* * Certainly a re-edit would be the minimum essential tactic.
RSS feed for comments to this post